So, this blog has been getting a lot more attention than usual recently for my reviews of mainstream country singles. And honestly, I never planned for that to happen; I just like discussing music and thought including reviews and other music coverage in my personal blog here might be a cool way to organize my thoughts on something that is a pretty significant part of my life. That’s not to say that I don’t welcome the influx of traffic - no blogger doesn’t like more hits, and I love rapping on the subject with with others - but, never having functioned as any sort of “critic” until now, I’ve been a little jolted by some of the negative comments that have come pouring in from some of the more aggressive fans of certain artists. What is most unsettling about such comments (aside from their tendency to personally insult me rather than objectively discuss the single in question - and seriously, you guys, that’s no fun for anyone) is that they often seem spurred solely by disagreement with the final grade I’ve given to the particular single.
But here’s the thing everyone needs to understand about my grading: I’m tough. I’m very tough, and I can’t do be any other way because doing so would compromise my experience with country music. At its very best, country music gives a voice to people who feel they have none, ponders the bigger questions of life without indulging in the rah-rah intellectualism that can mar other art forms, makes one appreciate the little thrills of everyday life just a bit more, disturbs the comforted, comforts the disturbed, truly changes lives. And it’s able to achieve all this because, at its very best, it is incisively written and interpreted with taste and passion by its performers and producers.
So you see, country music is very serious business to me. I don’t want to hear the artists who are supposed to carrying on the legacies of greats like Hank Williams, Loretta Lynn, Waylon Jennings, Patsy Cline, Willie Nelson, or Dolly Parton clowning around with any old crowd-pleasing hit. I want to hear well-crafted, well-sung stuff. Stuff that expands country music rather than exploiting it. Stuff that sounds real, like the person singing it has personally experienced it, like the memory of it is a picture they’re desperate to paint and singing it is the only way they’ve got left to do it.
So I nit-pick, I quibble, I complain about things like melodic structure and lyrical choices because I want excellence. I want to hear the singles that will change the face of country music, that will define artists and eras, that people will still be listening to twenty, thirty, fifty years from now. But even more importantly, I want to hear music that stops people in their tracks. I want to hear the kind of song you have to pull your car over onto to the shoulder to listen through; the kind so natural and engaging that it seems to become as essential to you as a vital organ; a piece so timeless that it doesn’t even seem to have a beginning or an end; it’s just always going, always breathing, and sometimes it happens to come on the radio. I believe those songs still exist, and my grading scale is a reflection of that belief.
So without further ado (and I realize there has been quite a bit of it up to this point), I’d like to walk any interested parties through what each grade in my system means, so that you can see how my thought process for all of this works. If you ever want to refer back to it, I will probably start posting the link to it at the bottom of each single review (to hopefully ward off some of the haters), as well as on the archive page for the Shameless: Country Music Rants & Reviews category.

A classic record. Immaculately crafted and executed; unique; deserves recognition as one of the great singles of its time.

A superb record. Virtually faultless in craft and execution; a stand-out work.

An excellent record. Outstanding quality of craft and execution despite a few minor shortcomings.

A great record. Very strong quality of craft and execution despite some observable shortcomings.

A good record. Strong in craft and/or execution with some observable shortcomings.

A decent record. Strong in craft and/or execution, though rife with shortcomings.

An average record. Achieves adequacy of craft and/or execution, but fails to distinguish itself.

A weak record. Generally lacking in craft and/or execution with few redeeming qualities.

A poor record. Deplorable quality of craft and execution overshadow any redeeming qualities present in the recording.